Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH TONAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

192

29%

LEVEL 2

189

29%

LEVEL 3

175

27%

LEVEL 4

99

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

199

27%

LEVEL 2

213

29%

LEVEL 3

210

29%

LEVEL 4

107

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

96

28%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

162

28%

LEVEL 2

171

29%

LEVEL 3

161

28%

LEVEL 4

89

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

293
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

174

26%

LEVEL 2

193

29%

LEVEL 3

195

30%

LEVEL 4

98

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

104

20%

LEVEL 2

167

31%

LEVEL 3

163

31%

LEVEL 4

97

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

101

17%

LEVEL 2

184

32%

LEVEL 3

191

33%

LEVEL 4

103

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

88

71%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

98

65%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

272
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

181

28%

LEVEL 2

187

29%

LEVEL 3

174

27%

LEVEL 4

98

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

317
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

191

27%

LEVEL 2

208

29%

LEVEL 3

210

29%

LEVEL 4

107

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

73

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

122

39%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

130

37%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.