NORTH PARK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

134

44%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

165

27%

LEVEL 2

216

35%

LEVEL 3

155

25%

LEVEL 4

80

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

56

40%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

78

47%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

99

23%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

125

28%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

30

81%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

28

38%

LEVEL 2

32

44%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

23

44%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

77

32%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

82

16%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

152

30%

LEVEL 4

79

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

57

93%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

83

74%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

95

58%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

118

33%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

130

43%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

234
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

161

26%

LEVEL 2

214

35%

LEVEL 3

154

25%

LEVEL 4

80

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.