LEWISTON-PORTER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

121

18%

LEVEL 2

155

24%

LEVEL 3

205

31%

LEVEL 4

177

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

410
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

114

17%

LEVEL 2

166

24%

LEVEL 3

199

29%

LEVEL 4

211

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

82

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

76

23%

LEVEL 3

93

29%

LEVEL 4

104

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

95

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

107

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

11

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

12

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

353
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

105

18%

LEVEL 2

133

23%

LEVEL 3

195

33%

LEVEL 4

158

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

376
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

94

15%

LEVEL 2

149

24%

LEVEL 3

189

31%

LEVEL 4

187

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

118

22%

LEVEL 3

191

36%

LEVEL 4

172

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

383
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

129

23%

LEVEL 3

176

32%

LEVEL 4

207

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

71

56%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

69

52%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

315
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

166

33%

LEVEL 4

149

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

330
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

114

23%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

182

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.