BARBARA ESSELBORN SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

146

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

55

15%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

162

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

71

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

76

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

75

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

86

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

23

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

36

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

106

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

108

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

16

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

15

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

39

14%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

139

50%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

153

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

30

40%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

237
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

145

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

259
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

52

15%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

158

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

87

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

111

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

59

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

51

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

234
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

60

18%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

141

41%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

253
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

155

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.