Skip to Content
Main content

PS 54 CHARLES W LENG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

144

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

140

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

77

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

74

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

67

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

66

40%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

92
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

63

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

98
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

61

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

51

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

47

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

21

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

18

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

127

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

125

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

25

29%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

230
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

138

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

235
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

63

19%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

138

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

67

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

73

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

77

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

67

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

240
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

69

19%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

143

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.