PS 57 HUBERT H HUMPHREY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

161

51%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

121

42%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

69

46%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

55

42%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

92

57%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

91

52%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

65

42%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

61

54%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

44

45%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

92

43%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

69

68%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

54

55%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

145

50%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

102

40%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

145

54%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

108

42%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

147

49%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

103

40%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

14

93%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.