Skip to Content
Main content

PS 42 ELTINGVILLE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

123

26%

LEVEL 4

159

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

118

24%

LEVEL 3

151

30%

LEVEL 4

160

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

82

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

81

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

77

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

79

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

25

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

34

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

115

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

84

23%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

106

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

12

17%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

152

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

157

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

44

38%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

52

43%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

279
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

63

14%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

158

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

306
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

66

14%

LEVEL 2

114

23%

LEVEL 3

146

30%

LEVEL 4

160

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

104

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

110

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

55

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

50

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

277
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

113

24%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

155

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

305
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

113

23%

LEVEL 3

148

30%

LEVEL 4

157

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.