Skip to Content
Main content

PS 44 THOMAS C BROWN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

206

57%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

183

52%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

97

56%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

82

49%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

109

57%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

101

56%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

91

61%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

74

53%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

98

52%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

97

55%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

100

45%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

106

75%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

102

74%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

182

54%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

163

51%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

24

89%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

20

74%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

196

57%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

179

54%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

34

10%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

183

56%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

163

52%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

23

61%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.