Skip to Content
Main content

PS 50 FRANK HANKINSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

51

13%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

218

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

39

11%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

215

60%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

112

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

111

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

106

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

104

62%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

46

82%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

45

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

140

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

26

12%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

132

59%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

24

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

32

46%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

22

7%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

213

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

15

5%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

207

70%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

305
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

48

12%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

212

54%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

292
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

38

11%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

214

61%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

150

63%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

121

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

68

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

94

55%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.