Skip to Content
Main content

PS 52 JOHN C THOMPSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

72

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

92

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

34

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

47

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

38

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

45

43%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

14

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

30

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

43

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

51

39%

LEVEL 4

48

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

12

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

69

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

88

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

18

47%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

71

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

84

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

29

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

32

38%

LEVEL 4

31

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

43

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

61

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

137
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

70

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

83

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

9

56%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.