PS 23 RICHMONDTOWN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

107

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

40

15%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

128

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

60

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

66

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

47

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

62

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

11

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

85

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

97

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

13

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

18

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

94

52%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

108

61%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

18

22%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

177
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

107

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

126

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

69

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

89

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

38

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

166
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

102

44%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

184
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

118

49%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.