Skip to Content
Main content

PS 16 JOHN J DRISCOLL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

153

57%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

117

50%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

79

59%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

54

48%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

74

55%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

63

51%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

61

70%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

41

62%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

83

56%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

68

50%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

68

40%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

85

86%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

67

73%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

113

55%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

40

62%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

35

58%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

153

58%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

115

50%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

127

56%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

96

47%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

26

58%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.