Skip to Content
Main content

PS 18 JOHN G WHITTIER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

50

46%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

26

27%

LEVEL 2

47

48%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

52

42%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

46

37%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

39

43%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

46

46%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

57

43%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

59

60%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

46

50%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

62

30%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

97

46%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

69

34%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

89

45%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.