Skip to Content
Main content

PS 4 MAURICE WOLLIN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

111

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

98

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

45

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

45

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

66

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

53

33%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

16

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

21

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

78

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

67

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

93

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

88

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

44

38%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

30

35%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

201
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

72

22%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

110

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

169
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

95

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

85

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

63

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

35

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

203
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

70

21%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

108

33%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

94

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.