Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS GATEWAY-HEALTH SCIENCES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

173

65%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

130

74%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

86

62%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

61

73%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

87

69%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

69

75%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

148
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

113

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

98
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

86

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

7

88%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

33

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

20

56%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

13

76%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

12

71%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

168

69%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

128

79%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

57

63%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

45

75%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

116

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

85

74%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

225
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

167

65%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

125

75%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.