PS 212 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

65

18%

LEVEL 2

82

23%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

114

32%

LEVEL 4

112

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

39

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

53

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

67

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

59

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

41

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

45

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

17

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

23

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

100

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

106

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

23

51%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

22

48%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

195
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

105

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

210
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

108

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

26

54%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

21

36%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

51

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

59

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.