PS 85 JUDGE CHARLES VALLONE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

101

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

108

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

48

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

43

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

65

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

37

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

36

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

45

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

48

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

38

43%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

22

25%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

99

40%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

105

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

29

74%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

46

18%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

99

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

158
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

108

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

20

56%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

67

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

75

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

39

29%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

56

21%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

99

37%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

160
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

107

43%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.