Skip to Content
Main content

PS 92 HARRY T STEWART SR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

116

30%

LEVEL 2

143

37%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

53

27%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

48

59%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

50

59%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

109
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

54

47%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

55

52%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

100

31%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.