Skip to Content
Main content

IS 145 JOSEPH PULITZER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

607
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,610

LEVEL 1

478

30%

LEVEL 2

525

33%

LEVEL 3

314

20%

LEVEL 4

293

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

664
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,654

LEVEL 1

489

30%

LEVEL 2

501

30%

LEVEL 3

326

20%

LEVEL 4

338

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

295
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 762

LEVEL 1

216

28%

LEVEL 2

251

33%

LEVEL 3

158

21%

LEVEL 4

137

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

315
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

241

30%

LEVEL 2

235

30%

LEVEL 3

159

20%

LEVEL 4

156

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

312
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 848

LEVEL 1

262

31%

LEVEL 2

274

32%

LEVEL 3

156

18%

LEVEL 4

156

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

349
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 863

LEVEL 1

248

29%

LEVEL 2

266

31%

LEVEL 3

167

19%

LEVEL 4

182

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

97
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

58

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

61

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

488
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,411

LEVEL 1

449

32%

LEVEL 2

474

34%

LEVEL 3

263

19%

LEVEL 4

225

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

547
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,452

LEVEL 1

457

31%

LEVEL 2

448

31%

LEVEL 3

281

19%

LEVEL 4

266

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

593
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,398

LEVEL 1

340

24%

LEVEL 2

465

33%

LEVEL 3

303

22%

LEVEL 4

290

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

643
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,443

LEVEL 1

352

24%

LEVEL 2

448

31%

LEVEL 3

307

21%

LEVEL 4

336

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

138

65%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

137

65%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

567
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,251

LEVEL 1

269

22%

LEVEL 2

415

33%

LEVEL 3

283

23%

LEVEL 4

284

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

631
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,333

LEVEL 1

294

22%

LEVEL 2

408

31%

LEVEL 3

301

23%

LEVEL 4

330

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

40
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

209

58%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

195

61%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

17

21%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

22

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

43

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

567
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,528

LEVEL 1

461

30%

LEVEL 2

500

33%

LEVEL 3

296

19%

LEVEL 4

271

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

585
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,501

LEVEL 1

457

30%

LEVEL 2

459

31%

LEVEL 3

290

19%

LEVEL 4

295

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

574
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,493

LEVEL 1

436

29%

LEVEL 2

483

32%

LEVEL 3

293

20%

LEVEL 4

281

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

627
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,547

LEVEL 1

459

30%

LEVEL 2

461

30%

LEVEL 3

304

20%

LEVEL 4

323

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

42

36%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

30

28%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.