PS/IS 78 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

64

21%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

94

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

71

19%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

164

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

81

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

54

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

83

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

15

68%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

23

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

46

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

41

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

66

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

40

36%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

34

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

89

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

158

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

23

41%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

195
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

91

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

254
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

158

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

76

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

128

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

36

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

199
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

94

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.