Skip to Content
Main content

BELLAIRE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

122

28%

LEVEL 2

143

33%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

71

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

103

25%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

85

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

50

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

15
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

90
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

98
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

54

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

40

35%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

25

33%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

37

56%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

39

53%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

167
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

90

24%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

79

23%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

24

38%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

120

28%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

70

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

181
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

93

24%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

83

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.