PS 35 NATHANIEL WOODHULL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

53

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

47

33%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

27

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

37

38%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

29

40%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

24

29%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

24

57%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

24

52%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

55

22%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.