Skip to Content
Main content

CYNTHIA JENKINS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

97

43%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

40

36%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

38

42%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

54

50%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

59

45%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

85

42%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

85

44%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

44

83%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

46

87%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

85

41%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

91

43%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

22

39%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

72

44%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

81

44%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

82

44%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.