Skip to Content
Main content

PS 196 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

364
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

19

5%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

292

75%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

323

82%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

155

74%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

213
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

176

80%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

137

77%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

147

83%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

23

77%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

31

91%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

151
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

138

89%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

146
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

137

93%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

99

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

124

74%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

26

62%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

27

69%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

281

77%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

311

84%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

11

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

12

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

354
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

5%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

285

76%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

373
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

312

81%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

11

85%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

285
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

4%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

232

78%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

289
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

247

84%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

60

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

76

75%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.