PS 220 EDWARD MANDEL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

46

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

53

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

42

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

56

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

58

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

64

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

42

38%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

44

35%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

23

39%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

88

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

105

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

22

51%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

84

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

167
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

105

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

45

58%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

46

61%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

28

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

39

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

80

33%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

70

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

62

21%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

88

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

80

25%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

106

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

15

71%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.