PS 174 WILLIAM SIDNEY MOUNT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

128

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

144

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

60

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

66

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

68

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

78

50%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

92
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

69

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

90
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

68

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

38

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

46

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

24

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

126

46%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

139

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

194
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

121

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

209
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

140

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

92

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

103

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

41

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

204
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

126

42%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

213
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

139

45%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.