CATHERINE & COUNT BASIE MS 72 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

206

61%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

196

65%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

89

56%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

87

57%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

117

66%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

109

73%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

143

63%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

135

68%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

29

60%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

30

63%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

142

54%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

138

58%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

64

84%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

58

92%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

187

59%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

176

63%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

19

95%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

20

91%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

166

61%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

162

66%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

185

62%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

168

64%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

28

70%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.