JHS 8 RICHARD S GROSSLEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

138

44%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

153

42%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

57

36%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

81

52%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

81

45%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

17

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

67

48%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

69

48%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

29

44%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

45

46%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

101

38%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

109

36%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

37

74%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

44

76%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

117

38%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

36

63%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

27

52%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

122

43%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

126

40%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

130

40%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

20

57%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

23

53%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.