PS 50 TALFOURD LAWN ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

71

19%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

110

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

102

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

67

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

58

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

22
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

44

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

45

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

18

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

99

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

37

55%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

36

50%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

106

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

187
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

99

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

33

58%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

14

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

99

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

88

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

196
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

100

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

87

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.