PS 146 HOWARD BEACH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

74

17%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

110

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

10

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

49

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

88

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

40

47%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

35

44%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

241
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

108

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

52

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

211
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

91

26%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

91

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.