PS 90 HORACE MANN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

116

31%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

79

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

40

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

160
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

12

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

72

20%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

177
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

74

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

77

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.