PS 97 FOREST PARK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

68

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

74

24%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

83

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

35

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

44

26%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

29

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

35

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

77

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

31

51%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

36

58%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

147
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

74

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

32

57%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

38

57%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

12

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

17

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

56

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

88

29%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

150
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

81

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.