Skip to Content
Main content

PS 105 BAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

296

58%

LEVEL 2

153

30%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

317

59%

LEVEL 2

147

27%

LEVEL 3

62

11%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

137

58%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

160

60%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

159

58%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

157

57%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

188

59%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

201

60%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

99

57%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

102

58%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

198

54%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

196

51%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

98

67%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

121

79%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

275

57%

LEVEL 2

148

31%

LEVEL 3

47

10%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

290

57%

LEVEL 2

145

28%

LEVEL 3

62

12%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

21

75%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

27

93%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

37

54%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

267

59%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

41

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

280

59%

LEVEL 2

128

27%

LEVEL 3

53

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

258

56%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

47

10%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

282

59%

LEVEL 2

129

27%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

38

69%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

35

58%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.