PS 162 JOHN GOLDEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

159

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

111

32%

LEVEL 4

153

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

68

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

60

37%

LEVEL 4

64

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

91

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

89

49%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

222
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

37

14%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

143

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

216
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

133

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

148

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

145

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

20

39%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

239
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

148

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

228
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

44

15%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

138

48%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

36
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

58

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

61

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

101

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

92

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

56

16%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

157

45%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.