JHS 67 LOUIS PASTEUR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

426
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

58

11%

LEVEL 3

125

24%

LEVEL 4

301

59%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

527
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

43

6%

LEVEL 2

106

16%

LEVEL 3

154

23%

LEVEL 4

373

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

214
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

150

60%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

253
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

182

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

212
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

151

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

274
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

58

16%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

191

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

288
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

231

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

361
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

30

7%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

289

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

44

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

54

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

16

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

402
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

41

9%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

290

64%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

499
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

19

3%

LEVEL 2

82

14%

LEVEL 3

138

23%

LEVEL 4

361

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

20

33%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

24

32%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

410
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

52

11%

LEVEL 3

121

25%

LEVEL 4

289

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

506
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

34

5%

LEVEL 2

98

15%

LEVEL 3

145

23%

LEVEL 4

361

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

254
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

32

11%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

182

61%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

53

14%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

208

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

26

12%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

119

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

165

54%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

420
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

57

11%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

296

59%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

519
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

105

16%

LEVEL 3

151

23%

LEVEL 4

368

55%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.