Skip to Content
Main content

JAMES J AMBROSE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

42

12%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

202

59%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

37

10%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

210

59%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

96

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

97

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

106

63%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

113

60%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

208
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

28

11%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

162

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

229
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

170

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

13

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

15

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

13

54%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

198

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

25

8%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

203

65%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

273
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

201

61%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

293
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

31

9%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

206

62%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

128

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

18

8%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

142

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

74

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

68

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

297
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

36

10%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

209

60%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.