Skip to Content
Main content

PS 159 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

52

16%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

168

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

159

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

87

52%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

96

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

81

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

63

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

184
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

134

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

177
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

123

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

25

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

26

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

20

35%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

165

56%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

156

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

23

56%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

239
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

152

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

142

51%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

16

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

75

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

88

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

93

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

71

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

249
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

157

50%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

228
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

144

49%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

15

63%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.