JHS 189 DANIEL CARTER BEARD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

131

21%

LEVEL 2

155

24%

LEVEL 3

175

27%

LEVEL 4

176

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

167

27%

LEVEL 2

135

22%

LEVEL 3

135

22%

LEVEL 4

184

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

71

23%

LEVEL 2

63

21%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

85

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

88

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

91

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

88

27%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

96

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

290
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

88

21%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

160

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

265
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

79

20%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

164

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

76

43%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

110

57%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

72

14%

LEVEL 2

124

23%

LEVEL 3

162

31%

LEVEL 4

171

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

90

18%

LEVEL 2

107

21%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

179

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

59

55%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

77

63%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

261
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

99

23%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

139

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

247
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

92

22%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

152

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

61

29%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

34

27%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

30

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

39

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

294
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

97

19%

LEVEL 2

120

23%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

146

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

249
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

125

26%

LEVEL 2

113

23%

LEVEL 3

104

21%

LEVEL 4

145

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

320
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

118

20%

LEVEL 2

145

25%

LEVEL 3

155

27%

LEVEL 4

165

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

301
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

153

26%

LEVEL 2

126

22%

LEVEL 3

129

22%

LEVEL 4

172

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

20

37%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.