Skip to Content
Main content

PS 193 ALFRED J KENNEDY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

135

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

120

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

58

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

55

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

77

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

65

55%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

68
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

55

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

40

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

60

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

61

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

15

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

130

57%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

116

62%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

13

42%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

180
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

126

55%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

178
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

117

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

79

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

76

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

56

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

44

53%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.