PS 169 BAY TERRACE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

86

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

91

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

47

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

48

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

39

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

43

49%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

51

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

50

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

28

39%

LEVEL 4

25

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

24

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

82

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

86

55%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

143
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

84

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

140
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

90

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

62

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

55

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

24

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

36

49%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.