Skip to Content
Main content

PS 184 FLUSHING MANOR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

110

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

118

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

53

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

61

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

57

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

57

47%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

86
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

64

63%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

61

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

38

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

41

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

106

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

110

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

106

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

179
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

31

14%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

114

52%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

64

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

65

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

46

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

53

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

103

45%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

109

49%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

9

75%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.