Skip to Content
Main content

PS 154 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

93

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

70

22%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

47

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

133
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

74

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

105
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

65

40%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

9

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

24

34%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

33

37%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

100

36%

LEVEL 4

85

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

87

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

160
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

100

37%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

26

50%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

26

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

19

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

188
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

92

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

9

75%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.