Skip to Content
Main content

PS 21 EDWARD HART GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

463
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

81

12%

LEVEL 2

142

21%

LEVEL 3

203

30%

LEVEL 4

260

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

420
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

100

16%

LEVEL 2

118

18%

LEVEL 3

162

25%

LEVEL 4

258

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

132

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

127

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

241
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

66

19%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

128

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

220
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

51

16%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

131

41%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

356
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

68

15%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

217

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

323
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

215

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

70

37%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

60

10%

LEVEL 2

118

19%

LEVEL 3

183

30%

LEVEL 4

251

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

390
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

101

18%

LEVEL 3

142

25%

LEVEL 4

248

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

21

28%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

34

42%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

406
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

48

9%

LEVEL 2

85

16%

LEVEL 3

155

29%

LEVEL 4

251

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

363
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

78

16%

LEVEL 3

125

26%

LEVEL 4

238

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

57
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

53

35%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

88

61%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

97

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

346
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

122

23%

LEVEL 3

174

32%

LEVEL 4

172

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

88

18%

LEVEL 2

104

21%

LEVEL 3

136

28%

LEVEL 4

161

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

413
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

55

9%

LEVEL 2

122

21%

LEVEL 3

176

30%

LEVEL 4

237

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

368
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

91

18%

LEVEL 3

141

27%

LEVEL 4

227

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

26

27%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

23

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.