PS 32 STATE STREET GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

76

17%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

227

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

108

25%

LEVEL 4

199

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

31

14%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

117

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

101

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

110

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

98

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

270
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

200

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

250
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

175

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

13

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

25

37%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

23

30%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

64

16%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

220

55%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

196

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

303
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

57

15%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

219

57%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

290
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

192

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

17

30%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

84

63%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

86

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

143

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

113

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

321
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

70

16%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

226

53%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

302
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

83

20%

LEVEL 3

105

25%

LEVEL 4

197

46%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.