Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 113 ANTHONY J PRANZO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

79

13%

LEVEL 2

172

28%

LEVEL 3

208

34%

LEVEL 4

155

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

381
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

123

22%

LEVEL 3

178

32%

LEVEL 4

203

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

71

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

101

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

60

22%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

102

38%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

16

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

19

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

91

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

119

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

134
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

198

38%

LEVEL 4

149

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

93

19%

LEVEL 3

166

35%

LEVEL 4

200

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

40

43%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

36

44%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

356
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

204

35%

LEVEL 4

152

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

373
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

116

22%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

201

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

77

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

122

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

81

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

355
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

73

12%

LEVEL 2

164

28%

LEVEL 3

200

34%

LEVEL 4

155

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

376
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

121

22%

LEVEL 3

173

32%

LEVEL 4

203

37%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.