PS 12 JAMES B COLGATE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

118

20%

LEVEL 3

184

31%

LEVEL 4

225

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

121

21%

LEVEL 3

170

30%

LEVEL 4

219

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

203
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

109

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

182
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

108

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

206
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

116

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

207
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

63

21%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

111

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

272
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

172

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

251
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

39

13%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

170

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

129
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

369
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

91

18%

LEVEL 3

157

31%

LEVEL 4

212

42%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

88

18%

LEVEL 3

144

30%

LEVEL 4

215

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

22

26%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

373
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

75

16%

LEVEL 3

160

33%

LEVEL 4

213

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

354
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

79

18%

LEVEL 3

140

31%

LEVEL 4

214

48%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

35
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

42

35%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

34

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

33

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

363
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

107

20%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

191

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

340
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

108

21%

LEVEL 3

154

30%

LEVEL 4

186

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

396
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

57

10%

LEVEL 2

114

20%

LEVEL 3

175

31%

LEVEL 4

221

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

366
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

112

21%

LEVEL 3

160

31%

LEVEL 4

206

39%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.