PS 143 LOUIS ARMSTRONG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 813

LEVEL 1

383

47%

LEVEL 2

210

26%

LEVEL 3

158

19%

LEVEL 4

62

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

313

43%

LEVEL 2

205

28%

LEVEL 3

145

20%

LEVEL 4

71

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

200

50%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

71

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

168

46%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

183

45%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

145

39%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

18

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

190
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

369

49%

LEVEL 2

195

26%

LEVEL 3

142

19%

LEVEL 4

48

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

190
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 687

LEVEL 1

308

45%

LEVEL 2

189

28%

LEVEL 3

137

20%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

236

38%

LEVEL 2

182

29%

LEVEL 3

147

24%

LEVEL 4

59

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

189

34%

LEVEL 2

163

29%

LEVEL 3

133

24%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

147

78%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

124

69%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

183
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

125

28%

LEVEL 2

139

31%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

183
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

119

32%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

258

70%

LEVEL 2

71

19%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

236

65%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

22

54%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 780

LEVEL 1

367

47%

LEVEL 2

200

26%

LEVEL 3

157

20%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

291

42%

LEVEL 2

200

29%

LEVEL 3

137

20%

LEVEL 4

65

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

201
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

335

47%

LEVEL 2

180

25%

LEVEL 3

143

20%

LEVEL 4

58

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

206
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

286

43%

LEVEL 2

180

27%

LEVEL 3

138

21%

LEVEL 4

68

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

48

49%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.