Skip to Content
Main content

PS 91 RICHARD ARKWRIGHT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

9

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

27

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

33

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

52

60%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

47

59%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

19

44%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

18

43%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

31

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

63

31%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

129
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

80

27%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

53

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.