Skip to Content
Main content

JOSEPH F QUINN IS 77 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 880

LEVEL 1

406

46%

LEVEL 2

262

30%

LEVEL 3

146

17%

LEVEL 4

66

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 807

LEVEL 1

378

47%

LEVEL 2

236

29%

LEVEL 3

113

14%

LEVEL 4

80

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

201

47%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

186

48%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

205

45%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

192

46%

LEVEL 2

125

30%

LEVEL 3

60

14%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

23

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

31

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

28

41%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

138
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

355

51%

LEVEL 2

203

29%

LEVEL 3

106

15%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

327

50%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

86

13%

LEVEL 4

38

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 659

LEVEL 1

237

36%

LEVEL 2

226

34%

LEVEL 3

134

20%

LEVEL 4

62

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

232

38%

LEVEL 2

196

32%

LEVEL 3

104

17%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

169

76%

LEVEL 2

36

16%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

146

74%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

193
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

250

37%

LEVEL 2

230

34%

LEVEL 3

128

19%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

185
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

230

37%

LEVEL 2

203

33%

LEVEL 3

106

17%

LEVEL 4

79

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

156

75%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

148

78%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

30

47%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

34

44%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 816

LEVEL 1

376

46%

LEVEL 2

245

30%

LEVEL 3

136

17%

LEVEL 4

59

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

344

47%

LEVEL 2

214

29%

LEVEL 3

101

14%

LEVEL 4

70

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

198
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 829

LEVEL 1

386

47%

LEVEL 2

245

30%

LEVEL 3

136

16%

LEVEL 4

62

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

181
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 747

LEVEL 1

346

46%

LEVEL 2

220

29%

LEVEL 3

107

14%

LEVEL 4

74

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

32

53%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.