Skip to Content
Main content

PS 81 JEAN PAUL RICHTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

35

27%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

8

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

123
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

123
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

54

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

28

37%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

18

40%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

15

36%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

57

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.